We noted in the previous blog that Jesus Christ in the New Testament is included by the apostles in the one God of Judaism. He is not a “second God,” neither is He the Father Himself. He is somehow distinct from the Father, yet in the full sense included in all that monotheism asserts about the distinctions between the one God and everything else (John 1:1-5, 18). This led the church fathers to the traditional formulation of the Trinity, in which God is one, yet in another sense is three. Jesus Christ is both fully God and fully human, one person with two natures. The word trinity does not appear in the Bible, but the traditional doctrine is thoroughly grounded in the evidence of the New Testament text.
One of the strongest biblical evidences for the divinity or deity of Christ is found in the progression of five hymns in the vision of Revelation four and five. The first two hymns are found in chapter four (Rev. 4:8, 11). In them praise is offered to the One sitting on the throne because He created all things. The third and fourth hymns, on the other hand, are offered in praise of the Lamb (Rev 5:9-12) because He was slain and purchased humanity for God. The fifth hymn offers worship to both the One sitting on the throne and to the Lamb (Rev. 5:13). The fifth hymn is the clear climax of the series, in which the Lamb joins the Father on His throne and receives the acclamation of the whole universe.
A second feature of these hymns also highlights the climactic nature of fifth hymn (5:13). The last hymn is the climax of a grand crescendo of singing. Each hymn is offered by a larger and larger group of singers. The first hymn is sung by the four living creatures (Rev. 4:8). The second hymn is sung by the twenty-four elders (4:11). The third hymn is sung by both the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders together (Rev 5:9-10). The fourth hymn is sung by more than a hundred million angels (Rev. 5:11-12). The fifth hymn is sung by every creature in the entire universe (Rev 5:13). So the fifth hymn is the climax of a great crescendo as all attention focuses on the throne, affirming the divinity of the Lamb.
Why does the divinity of Christ matter? Because if Jesus is fully God, then the human life He lived on this earth is the most important event in the history of the human race. God Himself came down and lived among us (Rev 1:1-3, 14). In the humanity of Jesus we see the character of God on full display in a form that we can understand. This means that the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ is the clearest revelation of God that human beings have ever had or ever could have. It means that when we have seen Jesus, we have truly seen the Father as well. If the Father Himself came down to earth and lived a human existence among us, He would be no different than Jesus was. Jesus Christ clarifies the picture of God in a way that nothing else possibly could.
Is there any validity or evidence to the idea that God the Son took on the role of Michael the Arch Angel to bridge the infinite gap between Creator and created, not that at first it was a redemptive roll, but after the fall (of Lucipher) transitioned into a redemptive roll for the whole of the Universe?
That’s my impression too. Scholars have noticed in both OT and NT what they call “angelomorphic Christology,” depicting Messiah in angelic terms. Rev 1:12-18 is a commonly cited example.
Can I get away with just a ‘huh?’ on this question and response?
I have always thought of Christ as the Arch Angel as sort of the commander in chief of His heavenly host of angels, probably for lack of a better understanding. If it isn’t too much trouble, what is “angelomorphic Christology?” I see the term on the www, but that isn’t always the best place to become informed.
Thanks for any information you can provide. (As you can see, I’m a little behind in my reading.)
Praise God and thank you for all these lessons.
angelo = angel
morphic = form
Christ = Messiah
ology = study of, or belief system
So angelomorphic means in the form of an angel. Christology is the study of Messiah or the person and nature of Jesus Christ.
So angelomorphic Christology is speaking about the Messiah or Jesus Christ in the form of an angel, as perhaps in Rev 7:2.
Does that help? 🙂
Yes, but I humbly say that Jesus Christ bridged the gap between divinity and humanity. Why was there a need to bridge a gap between Creator and created? What is the role of Michael, the Arch Angel? I gather it is not as Commander in Chief.
Thank you for your previous and future response.